DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR COR! TION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
Docket ! NR32471-14
24 Maz E
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552
A three-member panel of
g in executive ses
c 5 Your all
rdance with admini
oO e
Yy
considere ri y Lon 1 shed by OCNO memo
N130C2/15U1 i ( ry 2015 copy of which
iis ee
Arter ana conscientious considerati Che ¢€ re recora
C insuri Lene .
evidence submit
obable
4
se
It is regretted that the circumstances
favorable action cannot be taken.
reconsider its decision upon submiss
within one year from the date of the
is evidence not previously consider
decision in your case. In this regara
m i
ind that a presumption of regular
e
Docket No. NR3471-14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
SIAAY 7
th |) Jha
ROBERT J. O'NETLL
RByecutive Director
Enclosure: OCNO memo 7000 Ser N130C2/15U1091 dtd 9 Feb 15
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3218 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application cn 9 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6552 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECOF nae io 70 SUITE 1001 Dear Thiec i wour annlicratior . sate Ae f ‘ TALS s YOUr application C Ci y if 1 a Y rd and e il Tele - he - = ‘ In ad tt ird cons 3 dered N130C2/15UC of which v provided t Yr at icat mn Has Cl Wel Wil De that the c cannot be syed rea a+ Docket probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director Enclosure: OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0159 dtd 5 Feb 1 No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7189 14
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0151 dated 5 February 2015, a copy of which was provided to you on 7 February 2015, and is being provided to you now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7386 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3200 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of emergency leave travel. NR3200-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7671 14
NR7671-14 21 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tox Secretary of the Navy Subj: . Petitioner’s dependents arrived to Woodbridge, Virginia on or about 14 June 2013. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above mT mee S Pursuant to the delegation of authorit out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6796 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100° Vio ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RE Ref 2) Title LO U.S.C Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 2} OCNO memc - N130C2/15U0164 dtd 5 Feb (3) Subject’s naval record Documentary m es, nave- cons f the Q a ) y Docket No. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's proceedings in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8266 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Conseguentiy, when appiying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5674 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR5674-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4191 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C2/13U0816 dated 16 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.